🗺 Every page — the whole flow
The votes
Open questionsElections — when, where, howVoter turnoutPetitions — sign, start, shareWhat came of itGet involved
The budget
▶ Take the 2-minute tourThe money trailYour tax bill, explainedGrants — money we could go getWho gets paidWhat the auditors reportedThe receipt — arithmetic checkedThe documentsHow every number is sourcedQuestions people ask — answered from the dataThe plain-words tour
Public needs
Our waterJails & prisons — from holding to buildingWho’s watching — cameras, plate readers, the rulesWho to call — county and state officesBy the numbers — schools, health, disaster risk, bridges, grantsHow it compares — beside similar counties and the rest of the stateWhat has worked — how the county compares, and options with a track recordFind help
Dead ends & open questions
The docketThe calendarHow complete is this county?
Research for a better county
Receipts by railsFood sovereigntyGrow-opsThe food flywheelThe two potsFeeding the countyThe growing frontierThe grower’s almanacThe $400K blueprintThe research shelfThe precedents
The wider network
All countiesKindred workWhere we sit in the field
How to trust this
Where we standWhat we will never doHow this is securedThe traffic logStill building — what’s new, and fixes readers sentHelp keep this honest — correct or add somethingOur storyReport a problem
Stone County, Arkansas · by the numbers

Stone County by the numbers

Schools, health, disaster risk, bridges and federal grants for Stone County, from national public records — each with its source. The same page for every U.S. county is at countycommons.us/us.

How Stone County compares — against the other counties in Arkansas

“Highest” and “lowest” are just order, not grades: a high rank for poverty or hazard losses means more of it. Each figure's source is in its section below.

Public schools — district budgets, fiscal 2023

1 school district has its office in Stone County. School taxes are usually the largest part of a property tax bill.

MOUNTAIN VIEW SCH DIST1,613 students

Spent $25.4 million — $21.9 million to run schools, about $13,562 per student, plus $3.1 million on buildings and equipment. Money in: $3.5 million local (mostly property tax), $14.3 million state, $6.3 million federal. Long-term debt: $1.8 million.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2023 Annual Survey of School System Finances. Districts are listed by the county of their main office; some serve neighboring counties too.

Health, money and internet at home — Stone County beside Arkansas

Life expectancy74.1 years · Arkansas 73.7 years
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.5% · Arkansas 10.0%
Children in poverty26.3% · Arkansas 20.2%
Households without enough food (food insecurity)23.0% · Arkansas 18.6%
Households with broadband internet70.3% · Arkansas 84.7%
Households with severe housing problems15.6% · Arkansas 13.2%
Residents per primary care doctor2,080 · Arkansas 1,478
Residents per mental health provider576 · Arkansas 368
Unemployment4.1% · Arkansas 3.3%
Median household income$43,767 · Arkansas $58,748

Source: County Health Rankings & Roadmaps 2025 (University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute), which gathers federal data (CDC, Census, and others); measures cover different recent years. Blank lines aren't reported for small counties.

Disaster risk — FEMA's National Risk Index

Overall risk: Relatively Low compared with other U.S. counties. FEMA estimates natural hazards cost Stone County about $10.3 million a year on average in buildings, crops and lives. Ability to bounce back (community resilience): Very Low; social vulnerability: Very High.

The costliest hazards here

River and inland flooding$3.9 million a year · Relatively Low
Ice storm$2.3 million a year · Very High
Tornado$2 million a year · Relatively Moderate
Earthquake$627,777 a year · Relatively Low
Cold wave$525,293 a year · Relatively Low

Source: FEMA National Risk Index (December 2025), expected annual loss. Ratings compare counties nationwide; they're estimates, not predictions.

Bridges — condition of every public bridge, 2025

73 bridges in Stone County: 29 in good condition, 34 fair, and 10 poor (13.7%). “Poor” means a main part — the deck, the beams, or the supports — is rated 4 or lower on the federal 0–9 scale. It doesn't mean unsafe to drive; unsafe bridges are closed.

Busiest bridges rated poor

SH 66/Stone County
over TUBBS CREEK · built 1955
4,286 vehicles a day
SH 66/Stone County
over LICK FORK CREEK · built 1955
4,286 vehicles a day
SH 5/Stone County
over SYLAMORE CREEK · built 1938
2,500 vehicles a day
SH 66/Stone County
over TIMBO CREEK · built 1956
1,600 vehicles a day
SH 5/Stone County
over SUGARLOAF CREEK · built 1971
1,463 vehicles a day
CR 2/Stone County
over MEADOW CREEK · built 1990
1,024 vehicles a day

Source: Federal Highway Administration, National Bridge Inventory (2025 submission). Includes state, county and city bridges.

Housing costs — what rent runs, FY2027

A modest two-bedroom rental in Stone County runs about $916 a month, including utilities. To pay that with no more than 30% of income — the line HUD uses for “affordable” — a household needs about $36,600 a year. The county's median household earns about $43,767, so that rent would take about 25% of its income.

SizeRent a month, FY2027Change from FY2026
Studio$651same
1 bedroom$700+$7
2 bedrooms$916+$7
3 bedrooms$1,268+$4
4 bedrooms$1,284+$3

Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents, FY2027 (in effect since Oct. 1, 2026) and FY2026. A fair market rent is HUD's estimate of rent plus utilities for a standard, modest unit — about the 40th percentile of what recent movers paid. It sets how much a housing voucher (Section 8) will cover. Median income: County Health Rankings 2025. For help with rent, call 211 or find your local public housing agency.

Federal grants — the money that came in, and what's open now

Federal grants paid for $1 million of work in Stone County in fiscal 2025, about $85 per resident — to the county, cities, schools, hospitals, nonprofits and others.

Source: USAspending.gov, grants by place of performance, fiscal 2025 (Oct. 2024 to Sept. 2025). Search it by county to see each award.

Open now: federal grants county governments can apply for

Long-term health outcomes of people living with spina bifida
Centers for Disease Control - NCBDDD · CDC-RFA-DD-26-0222
closes 2026-10-26
OJP FY 2026 Special Attorneys Program Round 10
Bureau of Justice Assistance · O-BJA-2026-172792
closes 2026-10-28
OJJDP FY 2026 Juvenile Drug Treatment Court Program
Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention · O-OJJDP-2026-172741
closes 2026-10-29
BJA FY 2026 Veterans Treatment Court Program
Bureau of Justice Assistance · O-BJA-2026-172714
closes 2026-10-29
BJA FY 2026 Prosecuting Cold Cases Using DNA
Bureau of Justice Assistance · O-BJA-2026-172708
closes 2026-10-29
BJA FY 2026 DNA Capacity Enhancement for Backlog Reduction (CEBR)—Formula Grants Program
Bureau of Justice Assistance · O-BJA-2026-172718
closes 2026-10-29
OJJDP FY 2026 Strengthening Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Technological Investigative Capacity
Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention · O-OJJDP-2026-172753
closes 2026-10-29
OJJDP FY 2026 Multistate Mentoring Programs
Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention · O-OJJDP-2026-172745
closes 2026-10-29
BJA FY 2026 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement- Competitive Grants Program
Bureau of Justice Assistance · O-BJA-2026-172711
closes 2026-10-29
OJJDP FY 2026 Community and Schools Youth Drug Prevention Program
Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention · O-OJJDP-2026-172734
closes 2026-10-29
BJA FY 2026 Rural Violent Crime Reduction Initiative
Bureau of Justice Assistance · O-BJA-2026-172761
closes 2026-10-30
BJA FY 2026 Adult Treatment Court Program
Bureau of Justice Assistance · O-BJA-2026-172721
closes 2026-10-30

From Grants.gov: posted grants listing county governments as eligible, soonest deadline first; research-only and overseas programs left out; list updated 2026-10-19, refreshed weekly. 60 are open in all. Cities, towns, school districts and nonprofits have their own lists there.

American Rescue Plan money — how Stone County is spending it

The county government was allocated $2.4 million from the federal Fiscal Recovery Fund. As of its latest report it had committed $2.4 million and spent $2.4 million (100%) across 1 project.

Spent so far, by category

Revenue Replacement$2.4 million

The largest projects

Jail Expansion$2.4 million committed · $2.4 million spent

Provision of Government Services · Completed — “Construction of the new Stone County Jail. All funds have been exhausted on this project.”

Cities and towns in Stone County

Mountain View$593,159 allocated · $593,159 spent
City Of Fifty Six$21,108 allocated · $21,108 spent

All American Rescue Plan programs together — school, hospital, housing, business and other aid as well — sent $4.3 million to recipients in Stone County (USAspending.gov, by recipient location).

Sources: U.S. Treasury, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds — April 2026 reporting data (through March 31, 2026) — descriptions are the government's own words in its reports; USAspending.gov.

Cities and towns in Stone County

Unincorporated communities Census counts (2)
  • Fox CDP
  • Pleasant Grove CDP

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 places by county. A town listed with other counties crosses county lines.

How Stone County compares — beside 91 counties like it

“Counties like it” means other counties outside metro areas with a similar number of people and a similar median household income (about $43,767 here). Comparing with them, instead of the whole country, shows what similar places have managed. Stone County is furthest behind on bridges rated poor, jail population per 100,000 residents 15–64, food insecurity.

MeasureStone CountyTypical similar countyDoing best among similar counties
Life expectancy
about the same
74.1 years70.9 yearsAlleghany County, NC 77.3 years
Gogebic County, MI 76.6 years
Kemper County, MS 75.7 years
Adults under 65 without health insurance
about the same
11.5%11.7%Leslie County, KY 5.4%
Gogebic County, MI 6.1%
Powell County, KY 6.2%
Residents per primary care doctor
ahead of similar counties
2,0803,603Alleghany County, NC 1,004
Gogebic County, MI 1,197
Montmorency County, MI 1,328
Residents per mental health provider
ahead of similar counties
5761,126Pushmataha County, OK 97
Choctaw County, OK 121
Latimer County, OK 140
Children in poverty
about the same
26.3%30.9%Tishomingo County, MS 18.1%
Monroe County, WV 20.5%
Clay County, AR 22.3%
Food insecurity
behind similar counties
23.0%19.1%Hampton County, SC 13.4%
Monroe County, WV 13.5%
Jefferson County, GA 14.3%
Households with severe housing problems
behind similar counties
15.6%13.1%Monroe County, WV 5.2%
Conecuh County, AL 6.3%
Grayson County, VA 8.4%
Unemployment
about the same
4.1%4.3%Grayson County, VA 2.7%
Hampton County, SC 2.8%
Butler County, AL 2.9%
Households with broadband internet
about the same
70.3%76.5%Terry County, TX 86.5%
Calhoun County, FL 85.3%
Gogebic County, MI 83.6%
Jail population per 100,000 residents 15–64
behind similar counties
726502Jackson County, AR 90
Bamberg County, SC 166
Chicot County, AR 174
Bridges rated poor
behind similar counties
13.7%5.4%Jenkins County, GA 0.0%
Wilcox County, GA 0.0%
Turner County, GA 0.0%

“Behind” or “ahead” means more than 15% worse or better than the typical (median) similar county; small differences can be noise. Sources: County Health Rankings 2025 (health, money and internet), Vera Institute (jail, latest year from 2015 on), FHWA National Bridge Inventory 2025, HUD (metro areas), Census 2024 population. What has worked elsewhere on each of these.

What has worked elsewhere — on the measures where Stone County is furthest behind

These are options with a track record, not recommendations. Each one says what evaluations found, who rated the evidence, and where it fell short. Residents and their officials choose. Every measure and every option.

Bridges rated poor — what has worked elsewhere

Bridges rated poor: Stone County 13.7%, typical similar county 5.4%.

Regular bridge preservation (preventive maintenance) not rated by a clearinghouse

A road department seals, cleans, and repairs bridges on a schedule, before damage grows, instead of waiting to replace them.

What studies found: The Federal Highway Administration says preservation treatments often cost much less than major repair or replacement, and timely work can extend a bridge's life at a lower lifetime cost. The agency gives no dollar figures. It notes more than 30% of U.S. bridges are past their 50-year design life.

Who can do it: County road department with the state DOT; federal-aid funds can pay for systematic preventive maintenance on eligible public-road bridges · Done in: The article does not name specific places.

Limits: The case is mostly reasoning from agency guidance, not a measured study. Treatments must match the bridge and timing. Waiting makes later costs higher. Agencies should track spending to confirm savings. Evidence for this topic is thin.

Sources: FHWA Focus: bridge preservation and preventive maintenance

Bundling small bridge projects into one contract not rated by a clearinghouse

An agency groups several similar bridge jobs, often 7 to 10 bridges, into one design and construction contract.

What studies found: Pennsylvania's DOT reported savings of up to 50% on design and up to 15% on construction compared with one-bridge projects. Indiana's DOT reports bundling frees up to $50 million a year for other projects.

Who can do it: State DOT working with counties; county engineers · Done in: Pennsylvania (PennDOT local bridge program); Indiana (INDOT).

Limits: These are best-case 'up to' numbers from the agencies' own reports in an FHWA newsletter, not an outside study. Savings depend on bundle size and how alike the bridges are. Evidence for this topic is thin.

Sources: FHWA Innovator: project bundling

High jail population and pretrial detention — what has worked elsewhere

Jail population per 100,000 residents 15–64: Stone County 726, typical similar county 502.

Court date reminders and clearer notices Mixed (Promising for missed court dates; Ineffective for arrests)

Courts send text, phone, or mail reminders about court dates and redesign summons forms so the date and place are easy to see. This cuts missed dates that lead to warrants and jail bookings.

What studies found: Two New York City field experiments found that a redesigned summons and text reminders cut missed court dates by 13 to 21%. Over three years this avoided about 30,000 arrest warrants. A national review of studies found court notifications gave small but real drops in missed court dates.

Who can do it: Courts, county clerk, prosecutors, sheriff · Done in: New York City; the studies in the national review came from Multnomah County, Oregon, and Nebraska.

Limits: The CrimeSolutions effect for notifications is small (effect size -0.07 across 4 studies), and that page is no longer updated. The New York studies were for low-level summonses, not all charges. Reminders do not change arrest rates.

Rating: CrimeSolutions (U.S. Department of Justice), practice: pretrial interventions. Sources: Fishbane, Ouss and Shah, Science 2020 (New York City field experiments) · CrimeSolutions: pretrial interventions for ensuring court appearance

Pretrial supervision and release conditions Mixed (Promising for missed court dates; Ineffective for arrests)

People who are released before trial are monitored and given services, such as check-ins, drug testing, or treatment, instead of staying in jail or paying money bail.

What studies found: A national review of studies found pretrial supervision gave a small but real drop in missed court dates (effect size -0.16 across 3 studies). Overall, pretrial interventions did not change arrest rates.

Who can do it: Courts, county pretrial services office, sheriff, probation · Done in: The page does not name specific places for supervision.

Limits: Only 3 to 8 studies back each strategy. Practices differ widely between places. In most studies the comparison group had lighter conditions, not none. The page is no longer updated. The evidence does not show a drop in jail population.

Rating: CrimeSolutions (U.S. Department of Justice), practice: pretrial interventions. Sources: CrimeSolutions: pretrial interventions for ensuring court appearance

2 more options

Food insecurity — what has worked elsewhere

Food insecurity: Stone County 23.0%, typical similar county 19.1%.

School breakfast programs Scientifically Supported

Schools serve breakfast in ways that more students actually use, such as free breakfast for all, grab-and-go carts, breakfast in the classroom, or breakfast after the first bell.

What studies found: Free breakfast for all dramatically raises participation. Breakfast can reduce short-term hunger and marginal food insecurity, and state breakfast laws may reduce food insecurity among elementary-age children. It can also improve attendance. The page gives no specific percent drop.

Who can do it: School districts, with community partners; the federal School Breakfast Program pays per meal served · Done in: Studies took place in Dallas, Philadelphia, Arkansas (K-7 schools), and rural Minnesota high schools.

Limits: Some studies find breakfast in the classroom does not raise grades more than regular breakfast. Stigma, short schedules, and logistics limit use. The federal rate for a free breakfast was $2.46 in 2025-26.

Rating: County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, What Works for Health. Sources: What Works for Health: school breakfast programs

Produce prescriptions Some Evidence

A doctor or clinic gives patients vouchers or boxes for fresh fruits and vegetables, redeemed at farmers markets, grocery stores, or farm stands.

What studies found: Programs that include access to fresh produce appear to increase fruit and vegetable eating and reduce food insecurity. Children's programs may also raise food security and self-reported health in the household.

Who can do it: Clinics and health systems, farmers markets, grocery stores, local food networks · Done in: Wholesome Wave programs in Augusta and Athens, Georgia, and Hartford, Connecticut; the Navajo Nation's Fruit & Vegetable Prescription program.

Limits: Benefits may fade when the program ends or a market closes for the season. Time, training, and transportation are barriers. Long-term effects are not well documented. Insurance changes may be needed to pay for provider time.

Rating: County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, What Works for Health. Sources: What Works for Health: nutrition prescriptions

2 more options

Severe housing problems and high rent burden — what has worked elsewhere

Households with severe housing problems: Stone County 15.6%, typical similar county 13.1%.

Home repair and rehab loans and grants Scientifically Supported

Local governments and nonprofits give low-income homeowners loans or grants to fix heating, insulation, roofs, and other problems. Grants suit people who do not qualify for loans.

What studies found: Home improvements, especially warmth and insulation, show consistently positive effects on breathing problems, mental and physical health, and self-rated health. They are also linked to fewer school and work absences. A Milwaukee study found renovations raised nearby property values without displacement.

Who can do it: County or city housing office, community action agency, nonprofits; USDA grants can go to state and local governments and nonprofits · Done in: Boston Senior Home Repair Program; EmPOWER Maryland; MaineHousing's repair program; USDA Section 504 Home Repair for rural homeowners.

Limits: The page gives no effect sizes or costs. Some research links home improvement loans to more property crime. Loans add debt, so grants may suit older adults better. This helps owners, not renters.

Rating: County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, What Works for Health. Sources: What Works for Health: housing rehab loan and grant programs

Debt advice for tenants behind on rent Some Evidence

Housing counselors give renters free or low-cost advice on overdue rent and other debt. Landlords and housing agencies refer tenants early.

What studies found: Advice may reduce overdue rent and may help prevent evictions, especially when given early. A UK study estimated a 22% return on investment for landlords through less debt and related costs.

Who can do it: Housing counseling agencies, public housing agencies, landlords, legal aid, local nonprofits · Done in: HUD-funded housing counseling agencies across the U.S.; Homebase in New York City.

Limits: The page says advice alone is not enough for tenants facing high rent burdens or lost income. It works best as part of a broader program. Long-term effects need more study. The eviction findings come mostly from European case studies.

Rating: County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, What Works for Health. Sources: What Works for Health: debt advice for tenants

1 more option

Related: The money trail · Your tax bill, explained · Water · Jails & prisons · Grants. Spot an error? Report it.